Canada’s Ontario province passed legislation allowing the government to seize children from families who refuse to accept their child’s chosen “gender identity”
The aggressively liberal bonkers Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017, or Bill 89, was somehow approved by a vote of 63 to 23, according to our sources.
The law requires child protection to consider but respect a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.”
“I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently,” Gay Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill stated with a straight face to shocked reporters. “If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”
The bill supersedes the Child and Family Services Act, or Bill 28, which governs child protection, foster care and adoption services and is seen as aggressively pro-gay and open to abuse.
Bill 28 maintained that the parent of a child in care retains the right “to direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” However, the new law makes crucial changes: “to direct the child or young person’s education and upbringing, in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.”
Irwin Elman, married transman and Ontario’s provincial advocate for children and youth, said in a statement, “I believe that this new Act, in its principles, represents a paradigm shift for the province with its commitment to the participation of children and youth in every decision that affects them, the creation of a child-centered system of service, and commitment to anti-racism and children’s rights.”
A more sensible voice that appears to actual consider reality came from Jack Fonseca, senior political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition, who disagreed, and stated, “With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history. Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”
Just back in April, a Christian couple filed a lawsuit against Hamilton Children’s Aid Society for taking two foster children from their home because they refused to lie to the girls by saying that the Easter bunny is real. It takes a second or so for this to sync in, allow it.
“We have a no-lying policy,” Derek Baars, one of the foster parents, said to a shocked panel who found the notion of truth offensive. They then pointed out that a child support worker insisted that he and his wife, Frances Baars, tell the two girls in their care, aged 3 and 4, the Easter bunny is real and not stick with any gender until the relevant checks were made about the bunny’s chosen gender. “We explained to the agency that we are not prepared to tell the children a lie. If the children asked, we would not lie to them, but we wouldn’t bring it up ourselves.”
Due to the insistence on truth and shocking refusal to lie, the eligibility of the Baars, attendees of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America, was canceled and the children were relocated with lesbian foster parents who were at time of writing pledging to uphold the truth of the easter bunny and respect the gender pronoun. The CAS worker, who insisted that the Baars teach the kids that the Easter bunny is genuine, told them that the Easter bunny was an essential part of Canadian folklore and that it endangered the childrens ability to adjust to certain situations if lied to that the truth could be that the fable of the Canadian Easter bunny is withheld.
All Truth Exposed | Freemasonry to Symbology to Kabballa, Exposing Reality 
It’s a shame that the government is slowly moving from a system built around moral values and limited government, to now a system of communistic ideas and extreme government intervention. Are you conservative?
LikeLike
Hi Dylan, I tend to avoid the tags and look at each thing on its merit but I seldom don’t hold a view that isn’t inline with conservatism.
What do you make of Trudeau? Strange family, dress habits and general demeanour I say.
LikeLike
Well, I believe If politicians in America continue to purposefully endorse the ideas and beliefs of small minority groups, like the LGBTQ, we will soon be in the same situation as Canada. Now, do not mistake me for saying that minority opinion doesn’t matter, because it does. The fact is, the LGBTQ currently registers at 4.5% of the American population. They have lobbied leftist congresspersons into creating bills that if passed would violate the religious freedoms of many Americans.
Sadly, I feel that America is moving away from it’s former system of Judea Christian values, and into a more socialistic progressive era. If this socialistic progressive wave is not watched carefully, it could result in a major misbalance in our current culture, and then we would be more at risk for a possible civil war.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good post and I agree on all. I would add that I believe we are now in danger of falling for well staged political realism. I stay very much on the peripheries of most things but aggressive agendas like this are hard to avoid.
LikeLike
Well said. I don’t believe a country divided can stand like this much longer, especially when a false rhetoric is being spread by the power hungry to attempt to convince the masses that America’s representative democracy and it’s capitalistic free market aren’t working. Great blog!
LikeLike